Fatigue Analysis — validation & limitations
What this calculator checks and the method behind each result, the independent reference cases its engine is tested against, and what it does not check. Use it to decide how far you can rely on a result.
Open the Fatigue AnalysisWhat it calculates
Standard / method: Shigley §6 — Marin / Goodman-Gerber-Soderberg
Shigley DE-Goodman / Gerber / Soderberg · Marin factors · Palmgren–Miner (cycle counting per ASTM E1049) · Coffin-Manson LCF (constants from ASTM E606 tests) · Peterson notch sensitivity
- Goodman, Gerber and Soderberg fatigue safety factor with von Mises combined bending + torsion (σ_a_eq, σ_m_eq)
- Marin endurance-limit correction factors ka (surface), kb (size), kc (load type), ke (reliability) — 40+ built-in materials. Room-temperature only: the temperature factor kd is fixed at 1.0 and is not an input
- S-N (Wöhler) curve with Basquin slope b and operating-point overlay on the log-log plot
- Palmgren-Miner linear damage rule for variable-amplitude loading — up to six stress-range levels with per-level di = n/Nf and cumulative damage D. Enter pre-counted blocks (count them per ASTM E1049); the tool does not perform rainflow counting itself
- Coffin-Manson strain-life (LCF) for low-cycle fatigue below ~10 000 cycles, with elastic/plastic separation and transition-life Nt (ASTM E606)
- Stress concentration factor Kt/Kf interactive interpolator (Peterson/Neuber) for shoulder fillets, grooves, transverse holes and keyways
Validation evidence — independent reference cases (3)
Each case runs the tool's engine on a worked example whose values come from a published source or a hand derivation from the cited equations, and an automated regression test asserts the engine against those values within the stated tolerance. "Conservative" means the engine is known to sit on the safe side of the reference and the test asserts that side. Sources are cited; their text is not reproduced.
Endurance limit Se through the full Marin factor chain
AgreesSource: Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, 9th/10th ed. (SI), §6-7 to §6-9: Eq. 6-8, 6-18, 6-19 (Table 6-2), 6-20, 6-26, Table 6-5; worked Examples 6-3 and 6-4 as anchors
Inputs: Sut 690 MPa, Sy 580 MPa, machined surface, d 32 mm, rotating bending, 99 % reliability
Quantity Reference value Tolerance Surface factor ka 0.797777 1e-5 relative Size factor kb 0.855797 1e-6 relative (0.5 % vs book 0.858) Reliability factor ke 0.814 1e-12 relative Endurance limit Se 191.7325 MPa 1e-4 relative tests/golden/REF-fatigue-endurance-limit.golden.test.ts
Finite life on the S-N line and Palmgren-Miner cumulative damage
AgreesSource: Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, 9th/10th ed. (SI): §6-9 Eqs. 6-13/6-14/6-16 (S-N line, f 0.9), §6-12 (Goodman equivalent reversed stress), §6-15 (Palmgren-Miner); AISI 1020 CD from Table A-20
Inputs: Sut 470, Sy 390 MPa, machined, d 20 mm, bending, 50 % reliability, Kt 1; spectrum 230 MPa × 5e4, 200 MPa × 1e5, 150 MPa × 1e6 cycles
Quantity Reference value Tolerance Endurance limit Se 186.7884 MPa 1e-5 relative Life at 230 MPa fully reversed 172 275 cycles 2e-4 relative Life at σa 150 / σm 120 MPa 528 510 cycles 2e-4 relative Miner total damage D 0.468399 (SAFE) 2e-4 relative tests/golden/REF-fatigue-finite-life-miner.golden.test.ts
Fatigue safety factor (Goodman, Gerber, Soderberg) and Langer yield
AgreesSource: Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, 9th/10th ed., §6-10 and §6-12: Eq. 6-32 (Kf), Eq. 6-46 (Goodman), Table 6-7 (Gerber), Eq. 6-45 (Soderberg), Eq. 6-49 (Langer)
Inputs: Sut 690, Sy 580, Se 191.7325 MPa, Kt 1.65, q 0.84; nominal σa 55 / σm 80 MPa (case 1), σa 100 / σm 120 MPa (case 2)
Quantity Reference value Tolerance Goodman nf (case 1) 1.605835 1e-5 relative Gerber nf (case 1) 1.972892 1e-5 relative Soderberg nf (case 1) 1.522710 1e-5 relative Goodman nf / Langer nY (case 2) 0.930058 (FAIL) / 1.705280 1e-5 relative tests/golden/REF-fatigue-mean-stress-criteria.golden.test.ts
Limitations
Not checked by this tool
- Rainflow counting of a measured load history — Enter pre-counted blocks in the Miner panel; count cycles per ASTM E1049
- Welded joints (detail categories) — The Marin / Goodman method is for machined parts; use the /welds fatigue panel (EN 1993-1-9)
- Crack growth and damage tolerance (fracture mechanics) — Not computed; use a fracture-mechanics assessment for flawed or inspected parts
- Corrosion fatigue and fretting — No endurance limit exists in a corrosive medium; use test data for the environment
- Residual stresses and surface treatments (peening, nitriding, rolling) — No credit or penalty is taken; use test data for treated or ground surfaces
- Elevated temperature and creep-fatigue — kd is fixed at 1.0; above about 250 C apply kd (Shigley Table 6-4) and check creep
Results are engineering calculations for qualified users — see the disclaimer. Other tools: all validation pages · standards reference · symbols glossary.