Shaft Fatigue Safety Factor — Goodman Criterion and DIN 743 Explained
DIN 743
Page last updated
A shaft running in a gearbox, pump or motor is loaded in cyclic bending every revolution — the outer fibres alternate between tension and compression — while a steady torsional mean stress sits on top. That combination of alternating and mean stress defines the fatigue severity, and the question a designer must answer is: how far is the most-stressed notch from the fatigue limit? That distance is the fatigue safety factor, and getting it wrong in the non-conservative direction means a crack initiates quietly and the shaft fails without warning.
Two routes answer it. The classical textbook route (Shigley) corrects the endurance limit with Marin factors, multiplies the alternating stress by a fatigue notch factor Kf, and checks the operating point against a modified-Goodman line. DIN 743 — "Calculation of load capacity of shafts and axles", the German standard — builds a component fatigue limit from size, roughness and notch factors of its own, lowers the permissible amplitude through the material's mean-stress sensitivity ψ, and requires S ≥ 1.2. The MechanixCalc shaft calculator runs both: the Goodman check for its headline fatigue safety factor, and a DIN 743:2012 proof at every shoulder, keyway and retaining-ring groove of a solid steel shaft (scope limits are listed in the FAQ below).
Static strength: von Mises equivalent stress and yield safety factor
Before checking fatigue, the shaft must not yield under the maximum load combination. In the textbook route the bending normal stress, the axial direct stress and the torsional shear stress at each cross-section are combined into the von Mises equivalent stress, and the static safety factor is the yield strength divided by it. DIN 743 makes the same check its own way: each peak stress is divided by the component's own yield limit — which includes a static support factor and, at a circumferential notch, a modest yield increase — and the ratios are combined as S_F = 1/√((σ_zdmax/σ_zdFK + σ_bmax/σ_bFK)² + (τ_tmax/τ_tFK)²) ≥ 1.2.
For a solid circular section the bending section modulus is W = π d³ / 32 and the torsional one W_t = π d³ / 16, so σ_b = M / W and τ = T / W_t. Both routes use these nominal stresses; at a notch they are computed on the notch-root diameter.
σ_vM = √( (σ_b + σ_ax)² + 3·τ² ) ; SF_stat = S_y / σ_vMwhere σ_b = bending stress M / W; σ_ax = axial direct stress F_ax / A; τ = torsional shear stress T / W_t; S_y = material yield strength
Fatigue: the Goodman route
Under purely reversed bending a shaft fails when the alternating stress amplitude reaches the endurance limit. With a mean stress on top, the modified-Goodman line joins the corrected endurance limit S_e on the amplitude axis to the ultimate strength S_u on the mean axis; the safety factor is the scale factor that puts the operating point on that line. The notch enters through Kf = 1 + q(Kt − 1), Peterson's notch-sensitivity relation, applied to the alternating stress.
σ_a / S_e + σ_m / S_u = 1 / SF_fatwhere σ_a = alternating stress including Kf; σ_m = mean stress; S_e = Marin-corrected endurance limit; S_u = ultimate tensile strength
Fatigue: the DIN 743 route
DIN 743 reduces the smooth specimen's fatigue strength to the component's with four factors. K1, the technological size factor, lowers the strength of a bar that was heat-treated at a large diameter and so hardened less deeply. K2, the geometric size factor, reflects the gentler stress gradient in a thicker shaft. K_F penalises surface roughness, more so the stronger the steel. And β, the notch factor, is the form factor α divided by a support factor n that rewards a steep stress gradient at the notch root (β = α/n) — or, for keyways and retaining-ring grooves, a notch factor measured on test shafts and scaled to the actual diameter.
The mean stress then lowers the permissible amplitude through the mean-stress sensitivity ψ, computed from the component's fatigue limit and tensile strength. Load case 1 keeps the mean constant as the load grows; load case 2 lets mean and amplitude grow together, which is more conservative and what DIN 743 advises when in doubt. At high mean stress the yield limit takes over. The fatigue safety is S_D = 1/√((σ_zda/σ_zdADK + σ_ba/σ_bADK)² + (τ_ta/τ_tADK)²), and DIN 743 requires S_D ≥ 1.2.
σ_WK = K1(d_eff) · σ_W(d_B) / K_σ , K_σ = (β_σ / K2(d) + 1/K_Fσ − 1) / K_Vwhere σ_W(d_B) = smooth-specimen fatigue strength; K1 = technological size factor at the heat-treatment diameter d_eff; K2 = geometric size factor; K_F = roughness factor; K_V = surface-strengthening factor; β = notch factor
σ_ADK = σ_WK / (1 + ψ · σ_mv / σ_a) , ψ = σ_WK / (2·K1·σ_B(d_B) − σ_WK)where σ_mv = equivalent mean stress √((σ_zdm + σ_bm)² + 3·τ_tm²); σ_a = the stress amplitude of that load type
Minimum safety and what the two routes disagree on
DIN 743 sets S_min = 1.2 for both its proofs, presuming the loads are known accurately; where they are not, a larger margin is the designer's or the contract's call. The Goodman route has no standard minimum — practice for power-transmission shafts is often 1.5 to 2 on fatigue.
The two routes rarely agree to the second digit. DIN 743's notch factor through the support factor, its size factors K1 and K2, and ψ-based mean-stress effect are calibrated on shaft tests; the Goodman line is a general fatigue construction. On a shaft with a sharp shoulder and a large steady torque they can differ by tens of percent in either direction, which is why a German design review asks for the DIN 743 number.
Worked example
DIN 743 fatigue and static proof at a spindle-shaft shoulder: Ø60 mm stepping to Ø80 mm with a 2 mm fillet, 42CrMo4 quenched and tempered, turned surface. The shaft turns, so bending is fully reversed; the torque is steady (K_A = 1); load case 2.
Given
- Shoulderd = 60 mm, D = 80 mm, r = 2 mm (t = 10 mm)
- Material42CrMo4 +QT: σ_B = 1100, σ_S = 900 MPa at d_B = 16 mm; σ_bW = 0.5·σ_B = 550 MPa
- Heat-treatment diameter d_eff80 mm
- RoughnessRz = 16 µm
- Nominal stresses at the shoulderσ_ba = 120 MPa (rotating bending), τ_tm = 60 MPa (steady), σ_zdm = 5 MPa (axial)
Result
- Notch factor β_σ (bending)2.20
- Component fatigue limit σ_bWK162.5 MPa
- Permissible amplitude σ_bADK (load case 2)149.6 MPa
- Safety against fatigue fracture S_D1.25 (≥ 1.2 ✓)
- Safety against permanent deformation S_F5.32 (≥ 1.2 ✓)
- Size factors at d_eff = 80 mm: K1 = 1 − 0.26·lg(80/16) = 0.818 for tensile strength, 1 − 0.34·lg(80/16) = 0.762 for yield → σ_B(d) = 900 MPa, σ_S(d) = 686 MPa.
- Form factor in bending for r/t = 0.2, r/d = 0.033, d/D = 0.75: α_σ = 2.33 (torsion α_τ = 1.68).
- Stress gradient: φ = 1/(√(8·20/2) + 2) = 0.091 → G′ = 2.3·(1 + φ)/r = 1.255 mm⁻¹ (torsion 1.15/r = 0.575 mm⁻¹).
- Support factor n = 1 + √1.255 · 10^−(0.33 + 686/712) = 1.057 → notch factor β_σ = 2.33 / 1.057 = 2.20 (β_τ = 1.62).
- K2(60 mm) = 1 − 0.2·lg(60/7.5)/lg 20 = 0.861; K_Fσ = 1 − 0.22·lg 16 · (lg(900/20) − 1) = 0.827.
- K_σ = 2.20/0.861 + 1/0.827 − 1 = 2.77 → σ_bWK = 0.818 · 550 / 2.77 = 162.5 MPa.
- ψ_σ = 162.5 / (2 · 900 − 162.5) = 0.099; σ_mv = √(5² + 3·60²) = 104.0 MPa.
- Load case 2: σ_bADK = 162.5 / (1 + 0.099 · 104.0/120) = 149.6 MPa — below the yield-line limit, so the ψ line governs.
- Torsion and axial load have no amplitude, so S_D = σ_bADK / σ_ba = 149.6 / 120 = 1.25 ≥ 1.2.
- Static: γ_F = 1.10 (α_σ between 2 and 3), K2F = 1.2 → σ_bFK = 0.762·1.2·1.10·900 = 906 MPa, τ_tFK = 0.762·1.2·900/√3 = 475 MPa, σ_zdFK = 755 MPa → S_F = 1/√((5/755 + 120/906)² + (60/475)²) = 5.32.
Every number above is reproduced to the digit by the MechanixCalc shaft calculator's DIN 743 proof and pinned by its golden test. Load case 1 on the same shoulder gives S_D = 1.27; a keyway at the same section would govern.
Do it on your own numbers
Run the DIN 743 proof (solid steel shafts; see the scope limits in the FAQ) at every shoulder, keyway and ring groove, the modified-Goodman fatigue safety factor, the static check, beam-FEM deflection and critical speed for your shaft geometry. Free 30-minute preview, no sign-up.
Open the Shaft AnalysisUsing MechanixCalc at work? See plans & pricing — one subscription unlocks all 50+ calculators, PDF reports and saved projects.
Frequently asked questions
Which standard governs the shaft fatigue safety factor calculation?
In Germany, and widely in European drivetrain design, DIN 743 ("Calculation of load capacity of shafts and axles"). It proves safety against fatigue fracture and against permanent deformation, each to S ≥ 1.2, with its own size factors K1 and K2, roughness factor K_F, notch factors β (through the support factor at shoulders and grooves) and mean-stress sensitivity ψ. Elsewhere the Shigley/Marin modified-Goodman route is common practice. The MechanixCalc shaft calculator runs both — the DIN 743 proof at every shoulder, keyway and retaining-ring groove of a solid steel shaft (not threads, press fits, splines, cross holes, hollow or surface-hardened shafts).
What is the difference between the static safety factor and the fatigue safety factor?
The static safety factor guards against permanent (plastic) deformation under the peak load combination. The fatigue safety factor guards against a crack initiating under the alternating stresses over the service life — usually the more demanding check on a rotating shaft, because the fatigue limit is well below the yield strength and a notch lowers it further. DIN 743 requires both, each to 1.2, and the shaft calculator reports them separately for every section.
Why does DIN 743 use β = α/n instead of the Peterson notch sensitivity?
Both describe the same fact — a notch weakens a part in fatigue less than its elastic stress peak α suggests — but DIN 743 ties the reduction to the stress gradient at the notch root: a sharp notch has a steep gradient, so only a small volume of material sees the peak, and the support factor n credits that. Peterson's Kf = 1 + q(Kt − 1) instead uses a notch-sensitivity q from the notch radius and the material strength. DIN 743's version is calibrated on shaft tests and also depends on the yield strength at the actual size.
What safety factor does DIN 743 require?
S_min = 1.2, for both the fatigue proof S_D and the static proof S_F, presuming the loads are known accurately. Where they are not — uncertain load spectra, possible overloads, safety-critical service — a higher margin is the designer's or the contract's call.
Is the shaft calculator free?
You can use it during a free 30-minute preview with no sign-up, and a free 14-day account trial unlocks every calculator with no credit card. The branded PDF report and saved calculations are included in the free 14-day trial and in every paid plan.